The IBM Power and Vault team have delivered official ppc64le (IBM Power Linux) support for the Vault Kubernetes ecosystem, expanding platform coverage to all four major architectures: amd64, arm64, ppc64le, and s390x.
New multi-architecture UBI images are now available in both IBM Container Registry (ICR) and Red Hat Quay for:
vault-secrets-operator 1.5.1
vault-csi-provider 1.7.4
vault-k8s 1.7.6
This is an important milestone for customers running Kubernetes workloads on IBM Power, enabling deployment of supported Vault integrations without custom builds and helping standardize secrets management across heterogeneous infrastructure.
Sumeet’s blog dives into IBM Power and Red Hat OpenShift’s multi-architecture capabilities, teams can run Power and x86 workloads within a common operational framework, reducing platform silos while accelerating application modernization that fits your needs.
As OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) adoption continues to grow on IBM Power systems, customers are increasingly looking to combine advanced networking capabilities with on-premises PowerVM deployments. One area that often generates questions is how EgressIP behaves with a primary UserDefinedNetwork (UDN) and how traffic is routed from workloads attached to that network.
This walkthrough demonstrates how to deploy a Layer 2 primary UserDefinedNetwork, assign an EgressIP, and validate that outbound traffic from a pod traverses the UDN interface rather than the cluster default network. The example is particularly relevant for OpenShift on IBM Power, including PowerVM environments managed through PowerVC.
Why UserDefinedNetworks Matter
UserDefinedNetworks (UDNs) allow OpenShift administrators to create custom pod networking domains separate from the cluster’s default network. When deployed as a Primary network, the UDN becomes the pod’s default network interface and routing domain.
This can be useful for:
Application isolation
Dedicated routing paths
Network segmentation
Multi-tenant environments
Advanced EgressIP scenarios
For organizations running OCP on IBM Power, UDNs provide the same flexibility available on other supported OpenShift platforms while leveraging the scale and resiliency of Power infrastructure.
Prerequisites
Before creating the EgressIP resource, choose a valid IP address that:
Is currently unused
Is routable from your worker nodes
Exists on the same Layer 2 segment as the node interface hosting the EgressIP
⚠️ Replace EGRESS_IP_ADDRESS with a valid address from your environment.
For on-premises PowerVM deployments, this IP should belong to the same network segment as the worker nodes that will advertise the EgressIP.
Create the UDN-Enabled Namespace
Namespaces that use a primary UDN must be labeled appropriately.
💡 Ensure the UDN subnet does not overlap with the cluster pod network, service network, or OVN join subnets. In this example, 10.100.0.0/24 is used as the UDN subnet.
Enable EgressIP Assignment on a Worker Node
Label a worker node so OVN-Kubernetes can host EgressIP assignments:
In a lab environment, an unused address was selected from the worker node network and associated with the node through an additional interface configured in PowerVC – and EGRESS_IP_ADDRESS was updated to match the unused address that was routable on the network.
Verify EgressIP Assignment
Confirm that OVN successfully assigned the EgressIP:
oc get egressip repro-egressip -o yaml
Review the status section and verify the address is assigned to the intended worker node.
The significantly higher packet and byte counts on ovn-udn1 indicate that application traffic is flowing through the UserDefinedNetwork rather than the cluster default interface.
This validates that:
The pod is attached to the primary UDN.
The default route is installed through ovn-udn1.
Outbound traffic follows the UDN path.
EgressIP can be applied to workloads selected through the namespace selector.
Conclusion
OpenShift’s UserDefinedNetwork capability provides a powerful way to create dedicated networking domains for applications while still taking advantage of platform services such as EgressIP. On IBM Power deployments, including PowerVM-based environments, this enables architects to combine network isolation with consistent outbound IP presentation.
In this validation, a primary Layer 2 UDN successfully became the pod’s default network, routes were installed through ovn-udn1, and traffic counters confirmed that outbound connections traversed the UDN. Combined with EgressIP assignment, this offers a flexible pattern for workloads that require network segmentation and predictable egress behavior on OpenShift running on IBM Power.
Ashwin Hendre’s latest guide walks through the requirements, networking considerations, IBM Cloud configuration, DNS setup, credential management, and installation workflow needed to build a private OpenShift Installer Provisioned Infrastructure on IBM PowerVS while maintaining outbound internet connectivity.
Based on Natalia Jordan’s IBM Community article covering IPI PowerVS bootstrap node access, VPC networking concepts, jump host setup, SSH key configuration, and bootstrap log collection for OpenShift IPI troubleshooting
Infrastructure as Code for IBM Power systems just got easier. The IBM Power HMC Provider 1.0 is now available on the Terraform Registry, enabling administrators and automation engineers to manage IBM Power environments through Hardware Management Console (HMC) using familiar Terraform workflows.
With the provider, you can define and manage Power resources declaratively, integrate with CI/CD pipelines, and bring consistency to infrastructure provisioning across Power estates.
IBM Power Systems Virtual Server (PowerVS) is a great fit for data-intensive workloads. In this post, we’ll walk through deploying a single-node Apache Cassandra 5.0 instance on PowerVS using a RHEL 10 Bring-Your-Own-License (BYOL) image, fully automated with Terraform and a cloud-init shell script.
By the end you’ll have:
A running PowerVS LPAR (s1022) on RHEL 10
IBM Semeru Runtime (OpenJ9) for Java on ppc64le
Apache Cassandra 5.0 installed and ready to start
A public network interface for SSH access
Architecture Overview
The deployment is split into two layers:
Infrastructure (Terraform)
Resource
Purpose
ibm_pi_network
Creates a public pub-vlan network for external access
ibm_pi_instance
Provisions the LPAR using the RHEL 10 BYOL stock image
null_resource
SSHes into the instance after boot and runs the init script
Configuration (init.sh)
Once the LPAR is up, Terraform copies a templated init.sh script to the instance and executes it over SSH. The script:
Registers the OS with Red Hat Subscription Manager (RHSM)
Enables the RHEL 10 ppc64le base and appstream repos
Updates the OS and installs tooling (wget, curl, jq, etc.)
Downloads and installs IBM Semeru Java 17 LTS for ppc64le from GitHub Releases
Registers the cassandra YUM repo and installs Apache Cassandra 5.0
Drops a cassandra-manager.service systemd unit (installed but not auto-started — you control when it runs)
Prerequisites
Before you begin, make sure you have:
An IBM Cloud account with PowerVS permissions
A pre-provisioned PowerVS workspace (get the workspace GUID from the UI)
A PowerVS SSH key registered in the workspace
Red Hat credentials (RHSM username and password) for a RHEL subscription
Terraform ≥ 1.3 installed locally
The IBM Cloud CLI with the PowerVS plugin (ibmcloud plugin install power-iaas)
RHEL 10 BYOL image: This example uses the stock catalog image ID 585ca713-f303-45f0-a836-e9dd4f4c8f3b (RHEL10-BYOL) which is already available in PowerVS — no COS bucket or manual image upload required.
Repository Layout
.
├── main.tf # Provider, network, instance, and provisioner
├── variables.tf # Input variable declarations
├── outputs.tf # Instance ID and IP outputs
├── init.sh # cloud-init / SSH-executed bootstrap script
└── terraform.tfvars.example # Template — copy to terraform.tfvars
Step 1 — Configure Your Variables
Copy the example variables file and fill in your values:
Never commit terraform.tfvars to source control — it contains your IBM Cloud API key and RHSM credentials. The .gitignore in this repo already excludes it, and all three sensitive variables are declared with sensitive = true in variables.tf so Terraform redacts them from plan/apply output.
Variable Reference
Variable
Description
Default
ibmcloud_api_key
IBM Cloud API key
—
workspace_id
PowerVS workspace GUID
—
region
IBM Cloud region (e.g. us-south)
—
zone
IBM Cloud zone (e.g. dal12)
—
ssh_key_name
SSH key registered in the PowerVS workspace
—
ssh_private_key_path
Local path to the matching private key
~/.ssh/id_rsa
memory
Instance memory in GiB
16
processors
Number of virtual processors
2
rhsm_username
Red Hat Subscription Manager username
—
rhsm_password
Red Hat Subscription Manager password
—
Step 2 — Understand the Terraform Configuration
Provider
main.tf pins the IBM Cloud provider at ~> 2.4.0 and the HashiCorp null provider for the remote-exec provisioner:
terraform {
required_providers {
ibm = {
source = "IBM-Cloud/ibm"
version = "~> 2.4.0"
}
null = {
source = "hashicorp/null"
version = "~> 3.0"
}
}
}
provider "ibm" {
ibmcloud_api_key = var.ibmcloud_api_key
region = var.region
zone = var.zone
}
Public Network
A pub-vlan network is created to give the instance an external IP for SSH access:
pi_health_status = "WARNING" lets Terraform proceed even while the instance is still booting, which is normal — the null_resource provisioner handles the wait via SSH.
Remote Provisioner
After the instance is up, Terraform templates init.sh with your RHSM credentials and copies it over SSH, then executes it:
The --force flag handles re-registration gracefully if the instance was previously registered. The correct repo slugs for RHEL 10 on Power LE (ppc64le) are rhel-10-for-ppc64le-*.
Cassandra requires Java, and IBM Semeru Runtime (OpenJ9) is the recommended JVM for Power. The script fetches the latest release URL dynamically from the GitHub API:
Installing under /opt/ibm/semeru keeps it clean and separate from the system Java. The alternatives registration makes java available system-wide.
Apache Cassandra 5.0
The official Apache Cassandra RPM repo is added and the package installed. --skip-broken is used because Cassandra’s bundled JVM dependency is skipped in favour of Semeru:
Rather than auto-starting Cassandra, the script drops a custom cassandra-manager.service unit that explicitly sets JAVA_HOME to the Semeru installation. This prevents Cassandra from picking up an incorrect JVM:
The service is not enabled or auto-started — you decide when Cassandra runs.
Step 4 — Deploy
Initialize
terraform init
This downloads the IBM Cloud and null providers.
Plan
terraform plan -var-file="terraform.tfvars"
Review the output — you should see three resources being created: ibm_pi_network.public_net, ibm_pi_instance.cassandra_node, and null_resource.cassandra_init.
Apply
terraform apply -var-file="terraform.tfvars"
Total deployment time is approximately 10–15 minutes:
Credentials in terraform.tfvars — never commit this file. It is already listed in .gitignore.
Sensitive variables — ibmcloud_api_key, rhsm_username, and rhsm_password are marked sensitive = true in variables.tf, so Terraform will not print them in plan or apply output.
SSH agent forwarding — the provisioner connection uses agent = true, which relies on your local SSH agent. Make sure the private key matching ssh_key_name is loaded (ssh-add ~/.ssh/id_rsa).
Firewall — the pub-vlan network exposes the instance publicly. Consider restricting inbound access to port 22 (SSH) and Cassandra’s native transport port 9042 to trusted CIDRs via IBM Cloud security groups.
Cleaning Up
To destroy all resources created by this deployment:
terraform destroy -var-file="terraform.tfvars"
This will remove the PowerVS instance and the public network. The RHEL 10 stock image is not deleted (it is a shared catalog image, not a user-imported resource).
Summary
This walkthrough showed how to:
Use Terraform with the IBM-Cloud/ibm provider to stand up a PowerVS LPAR on RHEL 10
Bootstrap the instance via SSH using a templated shell script
Install IBM Semeru Runtime (OpenJ9) for ppc64le — the right JVM for Power
Add the official Apache Cassandra 5.0 RPM repo and install Cassandra
Register a custom systemd service that pins JAVA_HOME to the Semeru installation
The full source is available in this repository — clone it, fill in your terraform.tfvars, and you’ll have Cassandra running on PowerVS in under 15 minutes.
By default, OpenShift is a greedy scheduler, when a Pod starts it grabs the first requested resource CPU/Memory. There is a reserved bit of memory and CPU for kubelet and System services saved. A Pod may end up spanning different NUMA domains
The CPU Manager packs each Pod onto NUMA domains:.
single-numa-node a pod might fail to schedule on a node that has enough total CPU capacity but lacks enough contiguous cores. If you go to schedule a 8 vCPU pod, and you have 4vcpu on one node, and 4 vcpu on another, it won’t be able to allocate ending with a TopologyAffinityError.
restricted packs it into as few NUMA nodes as possible. This one is probably preferred as it allows for rounding.
If a Pod is idle, those cores sit idle. They won’t share the spare cycles of another Pod.
If a Pod used 100m, it’ll need to specificy round numbers now cpu: "2" in some cases.
For large workloads , CPU pinning is most effective when the pod is sized to fit within a single NUMA node. If your pod is so large that it spans multiple sockets, the benefits of pinning diminish unless the application itself is NUMA-aware.
You can see more details at OpenShift 4.20: Using CPU Manager and Topology Manager[docs.redhat.com]
Workloads run on full physical servers or are managed as virtual machines. KubeVirt brings cloud-native approach to fleet management and makes VMs first-class Kubernetes resources.
1. Physical Infrastructure
Typically, things begin with a physical server. A Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) provides hardware management, while firmware initializes CPU and memory resources. At this stage, all resources belong to a single system with no virtualization.
Key point: Physical hardware only, with no abstraction layer.
2. Traditional Virtualization
A host operating system such as RHEL, SUSE, or Ubuntu runs on the server. Libvirt and QEMU provide virtualization services, allowing multiple VMs to share the same hardware.
Key point: Virtual machines improve hardware utilization while remaining tied to individual hosts.
3. Kubernetes + KubeVirt
KubeVirt integrates virtualization into Kubernetes. Instead of managing VMs directly on each host, Kubernetes manages VM lifecycle through KubeVirt components such as Virt Operator, Virt Controller, and Virt Launcher.
Virtual machines become Kubernetes-managed workloads that can be scheduled, automated, and operated alongside containers.
Conclusion
The progression is straightforward Physical Server run Libvirt/QEMU Virtualization and are managed as a fleet with Kubernetes-Orchestrated Virtualization with KubeVirt.